Monday 4 May 2026 – Foundations of Open Science


What is Open Science?

Instructor: Ineke Luijten

This opening session provides an overview of the principles and practices that define Open Science. It introduces the historical development of Open Science and discusses its potential benefits and challenges for researchers and society.

View in Google Slides | Download PowerPoint


The State of Open Science in Sweden

Instructor: Ineke Luijten

This session explores the current landscape of Open Science in Sweden and Europe, both institutionally and at the grassroots level. It highlights major policy-making actors such as the Swedish government, VR, SUHF and KB. The session also examines the implementation of Open Science policies by higher education institutions, research infrastructures and individual researchers, and provides a framework for discussions about where responsibilities lie and where researchers can turn for help.

View in Google Slides | Download PowerPoint


The Ideology of Open Science

Instructor: Stefan Ekman

This session examines the ideas shaping Open Science. We explore competing visions, from technology-focused models to approaches that emphasize process, inclusion, and collaboration. Topics include commercialization, unequal access to power and resources, and the tension between standardization and diverse ways of knowing. Rather than viewing Open Science simply as sharing results, the session invites participants to view Open Science as a path to a more inclusive, fair, and collaborative research system.

For this session, participants may want to read:

Fecher, Benedikt, and Sascha Friesike. 2014. ‘Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thought’. In Opening Science, edited by Sönke Bartling and Sascha Friesike. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2.

Abstract

Open Science is an umbrella term encompassing a multitude of assumptions about the future of knowledge creation and dissemination. Based on a literature review, this chapter aims at structuring the overall discourse by proposing five Open Science schools of thought: The infrastructure school (which is concerned with the technological architecture), the public school (which is concerned with the accessibility of knowledge creation), the measurement school (which is concerned with alternative impact measurement), the democratic school (which is concerned with access to knowledge) and the pragmatic school (which is concerned with collaborative research).

We will interrogate whether “open” in open science is an unqualified good, and ask whether particular interpretations of openness can in fact exclude particular researchers or be detrimental to some types of research.