Open Science in the project lifecycle - evaluate & build
By the end of this session, learners will be able to:
- Summarize the role of CoARA in re-shaping researcher evaluation
- Identify future evaluation criteria for researchers and the importance of sharing all research outputs
Schedule
Time | Topic | Instructor |
---|---|---|
13:00 | Open Science in researcher evaluation practices | Ineke Luijten |
13:30 | Innovations in researcher evaluation - CoARA | Chris Erdmann |
14:30 | Coffee break | |
15:00 | Researcher evaluation: funders perspective | Sanna Isabel Ulfsparre & Amanda Klein |
16:30 | End of day |
Materials
Open Science in researcher evaluation practices
➡️ Open this presentation in Google Slides (for viewing)
➡️ Make a copy of this presentation (for editing or downloading)
Innovations in researcher evaluation - CoARA
➡️ Open this presentation in Google Slides (for viewing)
➡️ Make a copy of this presentation (for editing or downloading)
Researcher evaluation: funders perspective
➡️ Open speaker notes for this presentation in Google Docs (view-only)
Contributors
Reuse
All SciLifeLab materials from this session are available for re-use under . You are free to share (copy and redistribute) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon) this material for any purpose, even commercially — as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors.
All Vetenskapsrådet materials from this session are available for re-use under . You are free to share (copy and redistribute) this material for any purpose, even commercially — as long as you give appropriate credit to the original authors and do not adapt (remix, transform, or build upon) the material.
Please cite material as:
Ineke Luijten, Chris Erdmann, Sanna Isabel Ulfsparre, Amanda Klein (2025) Open Science in the Swedish context - Open Science in the project lifecycle - evaluate & build. Retrieved from https://scilifelab-training.github.io/open-science/2505/Session6.html